|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AlectoX 
06/30/2009, 17:47:56
Author Profile |
|
Son, you sure got some nerve talk like a grown up even when you've already been slapped down several times.First of all, you haven't provided jack sh1t in terms of evidence describing actual physical equipment going into an ALQ-99 pod prior to take-off. That FAS site you linked doesn't mention any loading of any actual parts. In fact I already said the description sounds more like a software upload than anything else. Now unless you can provide a link that unequivocably states a significant hardware modification is going on, you should go ahead and keep your mouth shut. SECOND, even if there WAS a hardware modification prior to takeoff you have still missed the point by miles and earned yourself a seat at the CMF Idiot's Table for repeatedly missing the point. The ALQ-99 designation for those pods doesn't change regardless of what software or hardware is loaded onto the things prior to takeoff, while the JH-7A is carrying pods that are so dramatically different that they almost certainly require different designations. Tell me if you can fit the external variations we see in that photo into a pod the size of an ALQ-99. Just in case you're too stupid to know the answer, you can't. Look inside a diagram of the ALQ-99 and educate yourself FFS. The point is that these pods being so dramatically different, may not be jammer pods (or at least one of those pods may not be a jammer pod). Those fins and that bulge certainly are not going to be explainable as serving to jam different frequencies. The inside of the ALQ-99 doesn't have anything remotely similar to that. Which brings me back to the original comparison. The multiple pods that the Growler/Prowler carry are all essentially identical even though they jam different bands, the internal physical differences between them being negligible to nil regardless of how hard you bitch and moan, while even a cursory examination of the JH-7 pods reveals they are vastly different animals and therefore almost certainly serve different purposes rather than different bands. Everybody else did not require this extended explanation and essentially figured out what I was saying right away. That you did not means either you're a complete idiot, or you were caught trying to be a fvcking smart-ass and couldn't stand to see yourself getting dressed down. I suspect the latter scenario is more likely, though the former is also a strong candidate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
AlectoX 
07/14/2009, 19:52:02
Author Profile |
|
"Of course the exact contents of a jammer pod are not open source information."Oh, how utterly convenient for you.
"What the articles do tell you is that each pod can jam two bands, out of ten total bands that need to be jammed. The articles also tell you the jammers have to be configured for their missions on the ground. That means they carry band specific gear inside that is swapped depending on which bands are anticipated to be encountered." Horsesh1t. Reading between the lines something that isn't there is either a sign of intellectual dishonesty or mere stupidity, neither of which bode well for you. That the articles say ground-based configuration needs to happen doesn't mean a hardware modification is required. It certainly doesn't mean that they necessarily carry "band specific gear" that needs to be "swapped" depending on target band. That is YOUR conclusion that you tried to wring from the text. Sorry, you lose. Big time. Not to mention you repeatedly continue to ignore what everybody else seems to have recognized right away in my post, that my comparison was between the ALQ-99 pods of the EA-6B and the significantly different pods of the JH-7A. In fact this is the main point of my post, something everybody else recognized and something which you have consistently ignored in your fantastically failed attempt to sound like a smartass, sounding instead like a total dumbass. Intellectual dishonesty seems to be your hallmark, and other people besides myself have already spat in your virtual face about it. Get a fvcking clue.
"We can all tell you have no experience with actual military hardware, and calling me names does nothing to lend credibility to your argument. It makes you look bad, not me." I'm sorry, did I miss something? When have I ever claimed to have experience with military hardware, you moron? I'm an academic, a physician. I've never been on a warship or inside a fighter in my life. But it does sound like your ass is claiming to have such experience, am I right? Something you haven't claimed all this time you've been here, but now all of a sudden you want to claim some "military hardware" creds? Hahahaha what a fvcking joke. You amuse me, kid.
"It also does nothing to deter me so why do you waste your time?" Deter you from what? Being a fvcking idiot? Not a single person on this planet could deter you from that, but that's not what I'm doing. I'm pointing out to everyone at CMF every time you open your piehole that you are in fact stupid, and I think every last person who has followed this thread has agreed with me. Scroll up, retard, if you forgot what other people here think of your posting in this thread. :)
"You seem to address every argument by calling people names rather than arguing the merits of your position." And you seem to think that repeating the same horsesh1t that you lost ten posts ago will somehow score you a moral victory if you keep perserverating on it like a retard. Nobody is on your side. Knock, knock, retard. Time to wake up, smell the coffee, and drink the Drano, retard.
|
|
|
|
