As I said, the integral representation of the sum is not exact for the leading
回: paciii, f-ooo. I think paciii's answer 0.25, is most likey the rite answer -- sigmaxi	回复	线索的首篇	信息区

作者: f-000 ® 02/18/2009, 17:08:26 作者简介 电邮作者 修改

terms. You can check with your excel program to a much larger number of terms, say 1000,000, or 1000,000,000, and see what you get.

回复 | 推荐 | 报警

评分

我在哪

前页 | 下一条 | 当前页

此信息的回复

It converges for sure, but must be less than the value of the first term --- sigmaxi ( 02/18/2009, 17:13:00 ) ( 12 bytes ) +1 I misread paciii's procedure. It is convergent when the limit is taken after --- f-000 ( 02/18/2009, 18:09:15 ) ( 24 bytes ) +1 0.239561 is the right answer. (无内容) --- f-000 ( 02/18/2009, 18:19:39 ) ( 0 bytes )